What do you think about when you hear the word, “standard?” General…
authority-driven… just normal? To me, the word seems lackluster, but it
encompasses a multitude of meanings when placed in the education system.
When reading Teachingto Exceed the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards, we learned
that the Common Core State Standards were initiated for the students, so
teachers are held accountable for each and every student and the progress they
make in the classroom (Beach, Thein, & Webb 4). But, when you here the word
“standard” you don’t necessarily begin thinking about a positive go-get-‘em,
fist-pumping attitude. Instead, the
words “homogeneous” and “standard” become interchangeable (Beach, Thein, &
Webb 11), and when these words begin to merge into one another, you hear other
words like “restriction” and “limited.”
So how do teachers break this barrier? Well first of all,
don’t think of the Standards as a barrier. Beach, Thein, and Webb state that
“the Common Core State Standards set general goals for student learning but
they do not specify what or how to teach” (Beach, Thein, & Webb 4). Three
years ago, I would have said, “Well, why not? Give me an outline, a schedule,
something!” Now, my mindset is completely different. I’m thinking, “What’s fun about that,” and
I’m silently nodding my head as I read, “The needs, abilities, knowledge base,
and interests of teachers and students vary from school to school, from
classroom to classroom, and even within every classroom—they cannot be
standardized” (Beach, Thein, & Webb 10). I, honestly, feel like tattooing
that quote on my forehead, so I’ll never forget it and so everyone can see it. As teachers, we take the Standards and involve them in OUR created lesson plans and then implement it in our one of a kind classroom.
The Common Core State Standards were not made to be set in
stone, and Troy Hicks reminds us in CraftingDigital Writing that the
educational world is not and should not be static. As more digital and electronic features and
devices become prominent, teachers shouldn’t look at the change as a burden
they must fit into the Standards but as an outlet to express or even enhance
the Standards. We, as teachers, should
use these tools as an asset that can help fit the Standards to the student’s
needs, which will also NOT be set in stone. In fact, the needs of our students
will encompass a wide range. How wide? Immeasurable.
In the short time I’ve been student teaching, I’ve already
learned there’s no golden lesson that will touch every student in the same way.
They all have different opinions and different ideas, which stem from different
environments—environments that will be different from your own! The Dynamics of Writing Instruction
mentions that a teacher should understand his or her own beliefs, and I think
this is helpful not only because you will begin to comprehend why you think a
certain way but it will also teach you to think about why a student thinks a
certain way (Smagorinsky, Johannessen, Kahn, & McCann). Once this technique
is mastered, the Standards can be used to benefit the students, as it should. When you figure out what works for the
students, you, and your classroom, you will go above and beyond the Standard in
a go-get-‘em, fist-pumping kind-of-way by finding who you are as a teacher within the Standard.

I really enjoyed your post. Your outlook on the CCSS is much more positive than my initial one when I realized just how many standards there were. I have heard from many teachers how difficult it is to fit in all of the things that their students are required to know for standardized tests, but I have tried to remain optimistic about being able to make them work within my classroom one day. Being at my placement school last week and talking with my mentor teachers about their teaching philosophies and seeing them in action has allowed me to become even more optimistic about how to handle implementing the standards into my classroom. As you mention in your post, we should really look at how we can "use these tools as an asset that can help fit the Standards to the students' needs." I also like how you point out the versatility of the students we will have, and that it will be important to try to reach them all, as well as your recognition that there will not be a way (or a "golden lesson") that will allow us to reach every student the same way. It is certainly important to remember that education is not and should not be treated as static; things are always changing, students are always changing, environments are always changing, so teachers must be open to changing and adapting the way we do things in order to meet the needs of our students.
ReplyDelete